market

Pensioners could be denied the £902 boost they are expecting from April as officials consider tweaking the triple lock calculations


Pensioners could be denied the £902 boost they are expecting from April as officials consider tweaking the triple lock calculations

  • Pensions should increase by 8.5 per cent next year under the ‘triple lock’ pledge

Pensioners could be denied the full £902-a-year boost they are expecting from April as Whitehall officials consider tweaking the figures used to calculate it.

Earnings growth figures published yesterday confirmed the state pension should increase by 8.5 per cent next year under the ‘triple lock’ pledge, which guarantees a rise in line with the highest of inflation, wage growth or 2.5 per cent.

But officials have warned that the Government is looking at plans to swerve the full increase. They argue the figures are artificially high and ‘distorted’ by one-off public sector bonuses and wage settlements.

These distortions are estimated to have inflated wage growth by between 0.5 and 1 percentage points, Whitehall officials have said. The Government may choose to strip out bonuses paid to NHS staff and civil servants in a move that could save the Treasury hundreds of millions of pounds.

Readers Also Like:  Steve McQueen's 1967 Ferrari 275 GTB may sell for £5.6m at auction

The Office for National Statistics said yesterday that earnings growth had been ‘affected’ by one-off payments between June and August.

Earnings growth figures published yesterday confirmed the state pension should increase by 8.5 per cent next year under the ¿triple lock¿ pledge

Earnings growth figures published yesterday confirmed the state pension should increase by 8.5 per cent next year under the ‘triple lock’ pledge

A full new state pension ¿ typically offered to those who reached state pension age after April 2016 ¿ could rise from £203.85 per week to £221.20 next year

A full new state pension – typically offered to those who reached state pension age after April 2016 – could rise from £203.85 per week to £221.20 next year

As a result, retirees could receive up to £105 less than they are expecting if the state pension rises by 7.5 per cent rather than the full 8.5 per cent. 

Former pensions minister Sir Steve Webb, a partner at consultancy LCP, said the move would not require legislative changes since Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride has the power to define ‘earnings’.

Technically, the Government would not be breaking the triple lock, said Mr Webb, but it would be an ‘obvious fiddle’.

Wages outstrip inflation 

Wages are growing faster than prices for the first time since October 2021, latest figures have revealed.

The Office for National Statistics said regular pay grew in real terms by 0.7 per cent in the three months to August. Actual wage rises have hit record levels – 7.9 per cent in the three months to July and 7.8 per cent in the three months to August.

Inflation, which peaked at 11.1 per cent a year ago, stood at 6.7 per cent in August. Figures for September published today are expected to show it inching down further to 6.6 per cent.

Readers Also Like:  Australian shares rise as Singapore looks at stock exchange reform

He added: ‘I would be astonished if the uprating the year before a general election was lower than standard. It would be an obvious fiddling with the figures. 

‘They can’t just use a new figure whenever it’s not the one they wanted.’

Last year ministers denied pensioners what would have been a record rise, suspending the triple lock as inflation surged to a 40-year high. 

It came after the Government identified ‘distortions’ in earnings growth figures as workers came off the Covid furlough scheme. In April 2022, the state pension rose by 3.1 per cent instead of the expected 8.1 per cent.

An 8.5 per cent hike next year would cost the Treasury £8 billion, raising the state pension by £17.35 a week to £221.20. 

The decision is due to be announced by the Chancellor in his Autumn Statement next month.

Steven Cameron, of pensions provider Aegon, said ‘it would be a brave Government to manipulate the figures before a general election’.



READ SOURCE

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.