Facebook owner
The social network
On top of the fine, which eclipses a €746 million EU privacy penalty previously
The ban on data transfers was widely expected and once prompted the US firm to
Monday’s decision is the latest round in a long—running saga that eventually saw Facebook and thousands of other companies plunged into a legal vacuum. In 2020, the EU’s top court
While judges didn’t strike down an alternative tool based on contractual clauses, their doubts about American data protection quickly led to a
‘Flawed’ Decision
Meta said it would appeal the Irish decision, describing it as “flawed” and “unjustified.” The company also promised to “immediately” seek a suspension of the banning orders, saying they would cause harm to “the millions of people who use Facebook every day.”
The data-transfer curbs risk carving up the internet “into national and regional silos, restricting the global economy and leaving citizens in different countries unable to access many of the shared services we have come to rely on,”
EU regulators in December unveiled proposals to replace the previous “Privacy Shield” pact that had been torpedoed by the EU’s Court of Justice. This followed months of negotiations with the US, which yielded an executive order by President
Read More:
The crackdown on Meta coincides with the fifth anniversary of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, widely seen as the world’s benchmark for privacy. Since May 2018, regulators in the 27-nation EU have had the power to wield fines of as much as 4% of a company’s annual revenue for the most serious violations. The Irish watchdog morphed overnight into the lead privacy regulator for some of the biggest tech firms with an EU base in the country, such as Meta and
(Updates with Meta response in sixth, seventh paragraphs)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Chapman
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.