As things stand now, election commissioners are appointed by the president on advice of the prime minister from a shortlist prepared by the law ministry. In keeping with the expectations of the Constitution framers, the Supreme Court directed that election commissioners be selected via a collegium comprising the PM, leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Chief Justice of India (CJI) till the enactment of the amended law. The Bill in its current form replaces the CJI with a Cabinet minister, contradicting the letter and spirit of the Constitution bench. Including the CJI, however, is not desirable as it allows the judiciary to stray outside its jurisdiction. The Bill follows from the verdict of the Supreme Court-appointed five-judge Constitution Bench in March. Drawing on the Constituent Assembly debates, the bench concluded that Article 342(2) encodes the constitutional expectation that Parliament would pass a law to ensure that ECI is free from executive interference. This expectation has remained unfulfilled.
The proposed law will have to be tested on the touchstone of whether it adequately protects the independence of the ECI. Sole executive control over selection as proposed fails this test. A rethink is necessary. GoI should turn to experts to draw up legislation that keeps this most critical instrument of democracy above the fray of murky partisan politics.