Global Economy

Great Wall of China damaged by excavators: Two detained in controversial shortcut attempt


Two individuals face detention after using heavy machinery to carve a hole through China’s iconic Great Wall. Their audacious act of creating a shortcut has ignited outrage and concern over the preservation of this historic marvel.

A Blatant Offense Against a Symbol of History

In an audacious act of disregard for history and cultural heritage, two individuals have been detained by authorities in Shanxi province for excavating a hole through the Great Wall of China. This monumental structure, crafted over centuries to thwart foreign invasions, fell victim to an excavator-driven shortcut, leaving a permanent scar on this ancient wonder.

The Quest for a Local Shortcut

The suspects, when questioned by authorities, shockingly admitted to deploying an excavator to create a shortcut in the Great Wall. Their intent, it appears, was to reduce local travel time. This cavalier approach to the preservation of one of the world’s most treasured historical sites has sparked outrage and calls for accountability.

A Historic Monument Under Attack

The Great Wall of China, a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1987, bears the weight of millennia of history. Initially constructed in approximately 220 BC, it underwent numerous expansions and renovations until the Ming Dynasty in the 1600s. This enduring military fortification stands as a testament to China‘s rich past, spanning centuries of dynastic rule.

Irreversible Damage to Ming-era Wall

The suspects, aged 38 and 55, reportedly dug a “big gap” through an existing cavity in the Ming-era Great Wall. Their blatant disregard for the integrity of this ancient structure and the safety of cultural relics resulted in what authorities described as “irreversible damage.”

Readers Also Like:  Changes in the works for surety bonds to make them lucrative: Nitin Gadkari

The Plight of the Great Wall

The Great Wall, renowned for its varying states of preservation, ranges from beautifully constructed sections with ancient watchtowers to remote, crumbling portions. Sadly, more than 30% of the Ming-era Great Wall has vanished, with only 8% considered well preserved. Factors contributing to this degradation include local farmers repurposing bricks and stones for their own use.

Cultural Consequences and Public Outcry

The destructive actions of these two individuals align with a history of disregard for the Great Wall’s significance. While such acts might not be entirely unprecedented, they have profound implications for cultural preservation. The Great Wall is not just a national symbol for China but a universal treasure that symbolizes humanity’s collective heritage.

The Road to Accountability

The audacity displayed by the suspects in their ill-fated shortcut attempt has placed them in significant legal jeopardy. Authorities are determined to uphold the historical and cultural importance of the Great Wall, and these individuals now face consequences commensurate with the gravity of their actions.

FAQs

Why did China build its Great Wall?
The construction of the Great Wall of China primarily served as a defensive measure to protect against invasions from northern nomadic nations. In addition to its defensive role, the wall had significant economic benefits and played a vital role in facilitating cultural exchange and national integration between various regions along its length.

What is special about the Great Wall of China?
The Great Wall is renowned as one of the world’s seven architectural marvels, celebrated not only for its extensive history but also its colossal scale and distinctive architectural design. This monumental undertaking involved a vast workforce, including soldiers, prisoners, and local residents, who contributed to the wall’s construction.

Readers Also Like:  Sexy Beast prequel series: Check out the release date, cast, trailer and more details

Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein.



READ SOURCE

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.