The market is a better assessor than any externally imposed yardstick on eliminating bias in AI output. Google’s setback in the race will be used by itself and its competitors to polish algorithms till an acceptable version emerges. So far, there is no assurance that bias can be eliminated by machines fed with information created by humans. AI, at its core, remains a probabilistic determination. The derived intelligence, such as it claims to be, is governed by statistical modelling, which is always accompanied by a margin of error. Human intervention to weed out inherent biases in the content AI trains upon also does not provide a fail-safe solution. At best, humans can correct, and in Google’s case, overcorrect.
The pushback to inaccurate AI will take the form of defining no-go areas till computing power can improve mathematical modelling to the point where human intervention is made redundant. That is quite some way off, if at all we get there. Till then, as the Gemini episode bears out, the market will impose limits on the range of applications AI will be permitted to address. These limits will co-evolve with technological sophistication.