technology

For Tesla and Musk, auto strike carries benefits and risks


The United Auto Workers strike against the Michigan automakers would seem to be nothing but good news for Tesla, the electric vehicle maker that has upended the industry and stolen customers from Ford Motor, General Motors and Stellantis, which owns Jeep and Ram.

Unencumbered by an activist union, Tesla can take advantage of the work stoppages to add to its substantial lead in battery technology and software. As the three established automakers face increases in labor costs and struggle to master electric vehicles, Tesla can twist the knife by lowering car prices because it is much more profitable than most automakers.

Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses

Offering College Course Website
Indian School of Business ISB Applied Business Analytics Visit
Indian School of Business ISB Digital Transformation Visit
Indian School of Business ISB Professional Certificate in Product Management Visit
Northwestern University Kellogg Post Graduate Certificate in Product Management Visit

But the UAW’s determination to secure a big victory for its members, amid a nationwide resurgence in union activism, harbors risks for Tesla and Elon Musk, its CEO, who has attacked and ridiculed unions on his social media network, X, formerly Twitter.

The UAW, which has failed to organize Tesla’s factory workers in the past, is gearing up for another attempt, a top union official said.

“There is a group of Tesla workers who are actively talking about forming a union and creating the best representation they can for themselves and their co-workers through collective bargaining,” said Mike Miller, the director of the UAW’s Region 6, which includes California and Nevada, where Tesla makes cars and batteries. Tesla also has a large factory in Austin, Texas, not too far from a unionized GM factory in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

In an interview, Miller declined to provide more details or identify the Tesla workers, saying they needed time to prepare before going public. This union-organizing effort is separate from a campaign at a Buffalo, New York, plant where Tesla makes electric vehicle chargers and employs data entry workers.

Discover the stories of your interest


But as representatives of the national union demand 40% wage increases from the Detroit automakers, along with significant gains in benefits, they are certainly thinking about the signal that any deal would send to nonunion workers at Tesla. “Clearly, the narrative out there is that this can’t be good for the Big Three, and if it’s not good for the Big Three, it’s good for Tesla,” said Rahul Kapoor, a professor of management at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Readers Also Like:  Elon Musk debuts 'Grok' AI bot to rival ChatGPT, others

But, he added, “If I’m an autoworker with wages lower than what Ford and GM are paying, and I hear there is a substantial increase, it’s very likely I would want to take that into account.”

The president of the UAW, Shawn Fain, fired a warning shot at Musk on Sunday on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”

“Most of these workers in those companies are scraping to get by so that greedy CEOs and greedy people like Elon Musk can build more rocket ships and shoot theirself in outer space,” he said.

A lot has changed since 2016, when a group of workers at Tesla’s auto assembly plant in Fremont, California, began an organizing drive that never acquired enough momentum to come to a vote.

Back then, Tesla was a struggling upstart flirting with bankruptcy. Now Tesla dominates the market for electric vehicles, with a 60% share in the United States. It is worth vastly more on the stock market than the three established U.S. automakers combined. It is arguably in a better position to reward workers than its rivals.

Yet labor organizing is arduous. Activists must get at least 30% of workers to sign union cards and force a vote overseen by the National Labor Relations Board. Companies often do all they can to dissuade workers from joining, hiring lawyers and consultants who specialize in defeating union campaigns.

Even if a majority of workers cast ballots in favor of a union, winning pay increases and better benefits comes only after negotiations that can drag for years. Amazon workers at a Staten Island, New York, warehouse voted in April 2022 to unionize, but Amazon has challenged the result and has yet to begin bargaining on a contract.

Still, Tesla would be a tempting target for unions. The company reported profit of $2.7 billion on sales of $25 billion in the second quarter, giving it a profit margin of about 11%. That profit margin is more than that of Ford or GM, even after an exceptionally profitable period for those companies. Stellantis, which was created by the 2021 merger of Fiat Chrysler and Peugeot SA, reported an 11% profit margin in the first six months of the year but lost market share in the United States.

Readers Also Like:  Chandrayaan-3: ISRO makes first observations from ChaSTE payload

Tesla’s stronger financial performance has allowed it to significantly cut car prices, making it harder for the established carmakers to gain ground in electric vehicles. The least expensive Model 3 sedan costs about $33,000 after federal tax credits, less than comparable gasoline vehicles.

The climate for organized labor is better than it has been for years. President Joe Biden is a big supporter of unions. Hollywood writers and actors are on strike, a high-profile manifestation of labor activism. In August, UPS employees won their biggest raises ever in a contract negotiated by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment, but Musk seemed to acknowledge the union threat last week, saying on X that his workers were better off than employees of GM, Ford and Stellantis. “We pay more than the UAW,” he said, although he added that “performance expectations are also higher.”

The traditional automakers quarreled with Musk’s math, saying that they pay their workers substantially more and that a big raise would only widen the gap and undermine their ability to invest in electric vehicle and battery factories. Ford says its hourly employees make an average of $112,000 per year including benefits, compared with about $90,000 at Tesla.

The Ford figures do not include stock options that Tesla grants employees, and that can be worth a lot. Musk has said that some production workers have become millionaires from their shares in the company.

Stock options can be lucrative but also risky. Tesla has not detailed how often or in what amount it distributes options to rank-and-file workers. In regulatory filings, the company has said the options those workers receive have a vesting period, meaning that employees must remain at the company for a certain period to cash them in.

Tesla workers may lose their options if they are fired or forced to quit because of injury or poor health, said Bryan Schwartz, a lawyer in Oakland, California, who has represented the company’s employees in lawsuits against the company.

Readers Also Like:  Delhivery forms subsidiary to offer drone services

“There are lots of issues with options to the degree workers can really count on them,” Schwartz said.

Stock awards fluctuate in value along with Tesla’s share price. The stock peaked at more than $400 in late 2021, plummeted to a little more than $100 last year and rebounded this year to $270. The uncertainty may be unsettling for workers trying to make mortgage payments and pay for child care.

“If I was a Tesla worker, with all these other companies making EV’s, I would prefer a wage,” said Rick Eckstein, a professor of sociology at Villanova University who follows labor issues.

Tesla has a reputation as a tough place to work, with long hours and punishing deadlines. Schwartz has sued Tesla on behalf of Black employees who say they faced discrimination in promotions and work assignments and were subject to racist abuse. Tesla has denied the accusations.

Any union drive would face forceful opposition from Musk. The National Labor Relations Board has found that Musk illegally threatened employees in 2018 by implying they would lose their stock options if they voted to unionize. The labor board also found that Tesla illegally fired one of the lead organizers.

An appeals court upheld the board’s decision. Tesla, which argues that Musk and the company did nothing wrong, is appealing the court ruling.

Without doubt, the strike poses huge risks for the Detroit automakers, which were slow to take Tesla seriously and stand to lose precious time they need to catch up.

“The real winner in the UAW strike will likely be the auto company that has been winning all along,” Gary Black, managing partner of The Future Fund, an investment firm that owns Tesla stock, said on X.

But any schadenfreude among Tesla investors could be brief.

“The strike could be a bellwether,” said Eckstein. “It’s a hot time in the labor movement.”



READ SOURCE

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.