OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is speaking in front of Congress about the dangers of AI after his company’s ChatGPT exploded in popularity in the past few months.
Lawmakers are grilling the CEO, stressing that ChatGPT and other models could shape ‘human history’ like the printing press or the atomic bomb.
The printing press, according to officials, brought liberty to the American people, while the atomic bomb left behind haunting consequences.
Altman told senators that generative AI could be a ‘printing press moment,’ but he is not blind to its fault, noting policymakers and industry leaders need to work together to ‘make it so.’
Tuesday’s hearing is the first of a series intended to write rules for AI, which lawmakers said should have been done with the birth of social media.
Senator Richard Blumenthal, who presided over the hearing, said Congress failed to seize the moment with social media, allowing predators to harm children – but that moment has not passed with AI.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is speaking in front of Congress about the dangers of AI after his company’s ChatGPT exploded in popularity in just a few months
San Francisco-based OpenAI rocketed to public attention after it released ChatGPT late last year.
ChatGPT is a free chatbot tool that answers questions with convincingly human-like responses.
Senator Josh Hawley said: ‘A year ago we couldn’t have had this discussion because this tech had not yet burst to public. But [this hearing] shows just how rapidly [AI] is changing and transforming our world.’
Tuesday’s hearing aimed not to control AI, but to start a discussion on how to make ChatGPT and other models transparent, ensure risks are disclosed and establish scorecards.
Blumenthal, the Connecticut Democrat who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on privacy, technology and the law, opened the hearing with a recorded speech that sounded like the senator but was actually a voice clone trained on Blumenthal’s floor speeches and reciting a speech written by ChatGPT after he asked the chatbot, ‘How I would open this hearing?’
The result was impressive, said Blumenthal, but he added, ‘What if I had asked it, and what if it had provided an endorsement of Ukraine surrendering or (Russian President) Vladimir Putin´s leadership?’
Blumenthal said AI companies should be required to test their systems and disclose known risks before releasing them.
San Francisco-based OpenAI rocketed to public attention after it released ChatGPT late last year. ChatGPT is a free chatbot tool that answers questions with convincingly human-like responses
Altman told senators that generative AI could be a ‘printing press moment,’ but he is not blind to its fault, noting policymakers and industry leaders need to work together to ‘make it so’
Altman, who looked flushed and wide-eyed during the grilling over the future AI could create, admitted his ‘worst fears’ are causing ‘significant harm to the world’ using his technology.
‘If this technology goes wrong, it could go quite wrong, and we want to be vocal about that. We want to work with the government to prevent that from happening,’ he continued.
One issue raised during the hearing has been discussed among the public – how AI will impact jobs.
‘The biggest nightmare is the looming industrial revolution of the displacement of workers.’ Blumenthal said in his opening statement.
Altman addressed this concern later in the hearing, stating he thinks the technology will ‘entirely automate away some jobs.’
While ChatGPT could eliminate jobs, Altman predicted, it will also create new ones ‘that we believe will be much better.’
‘I believe that there will be far greater jobs on the other side of this, and the jobs of today will get better,’ he said.
‘I think it will entirely automate away some jobs, and it will create new ones that we believe will be much better.’
‘There will be an impact on jobs. We try to be very clear about that,’ he said.
Also sitting in the court was Christina Montgomery, IBM’s chief privacy officer, who also admitted AI will change everyday jobs but will also create new ones.
‘I am a personal example of a job that didn’t exist [before AI],’ she said.
