On Tuesday in Johannesburg, Brazilian president Lula da Silva was cogent when he stated, ‘We do not want to be a counterpoint to the G7, G20 or the United States. We just want to organise ourselves.’ Coming from a BRICS member that has, like India, known the value of ‘non-aligned’ issue-based support and pushback, Lula’s call-out is important. As is Joe Biden’s announced presence next month at the G20 summit in New Delhi. China’s and Russia’s attempted brand-hijacking of BRICS as an ‘anti-Western’ cabal seeking new members defuses the grouping’s real value: leveraging what is best, without becoming a go-to anti-Western platform best-suited for the likes of Taliban and Pyongyang. This doesn’t mean that the ‘West’ has been the poster-boy gardener of the global commons. But it was South Africa and India that led the large group of countries – not ‘anti-neo-imperialist’/neo-Cold Warriors China or Russia – demanding the rights to manufacture Covid-19 vaccines and treatments at WTO against Western manufacturers and their nations.
India – and other BRICS countries – must engage with the West as G20 members and beyond, both as partner and course-corrector. In the same manner, they should keep BRICS on an even keel. BRICS should expand, but expand for the right reason: for more countries to have a louder voice in conducting the world’s business. And not to just hold a placard with the sign, ‘tseW’ – the mirror-image opposite of ‘West’.