market

Apple fails to win reprieve over US Watch sales ban


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Apple has been banned from selling the Watch Series 9 and Watch Ultra 2 in the US after President Joe Biden’s administration refused to grant a reprieve from a trade tribunal’s decision that it had infringed the patent of another company.

Apple confirmed on Tuesday that it had appealed against the earlier ruling from the US International Trade Commission, which stems from a patent dispute with health technology company Masimo.

The Biden administration had had 60 days from the ITC decision, which was handed down in October, to decide whether to allow it to take effect. The authority to decide whether to intervene was delegated by the White House to the US trade representative, Katherine Tai.

“After careful consultations, ambassador Tai decided not to reverse the ITC’s determination and the ITC’s decision became final on December 26 2023,” Tai’s office said in a statement on Tuesday.

Masimo in a statement said that the ITC’s decision “marks a significant moment for the US as a defender of innovation and a protector of inventors’ rights”.

In a statement, Apple said it disagreed with the ITC’s decision and exclusion order and was “taking all measures to return Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 to customers in the US as soon as possible”.

Ahead of a final decision from the White House, Apple had said it would pre-emptively halt sales of the affected models in the US on its website from December 21, and in physical stores from December 24.

Readers Also Like:  Net Zero? No New Offshore Wind for UK

It is rare for the White House to wade into such cases, although the Obama administration vetoed a patent ban on iPhones and iPads in 2013 during the company’s legal dispute with Samsung.

The ruling deals a blow to Apple, which is facing a slowdown in hardware sales this year. Earlier models of the Apple Watch remain available in the US, and the company said the ban would have no effect on service for customers who have already bought the new models.

The case stems from a legal dispute between Apple and Irvine, California-headquartered Masimo over the patent on the technology for measuring blood oxygen levels on the devices. The method, known as pulse oximetry, measures oxygen in the blood by shining light into the wrist.

Apple first introduced the technology in 2020, in an effort to draw in more consumers and give them the incentive to upgrade with new features on the device. Masimo said Apple copied its patented technology.

The ITC ruled in Masimo’s favour, issuing a “limited exclusion order” against Apple’s products.

Masimo has separately sued Apple in federal court alleging trade secret violations. A trial in that case ended with a hung jury in May.

Apple is similarly embroiled in litigation with medical wearables company AliveCor over the heart rate monitoring technology on its watches. In December 2022 the ITC upheld a judge’s ruling that Apple violated AliveCor’s patent. 

But that same month, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated the AliveCor patent at the centre of the dispute, putting any potential ban on hold pending appeals.

Readers Also Like:  ECGC IPO likely to be pushed to next fiscal amid volatility



READ SOURCE

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.