Chartered accountants (CA), company secretaries (CS) and cost accountants (CWA) managing client money for a specified set of financial transactions have been made reporting entities for the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which imposes stringent compliance but has a poor record of conviction. This pulls down the ease of doing business and could explain why the government has not widened the net of reporting entities to include lawyers, who are covered by the FATF guidelines. The Supreme Court has observed that the concept of the offence of money laundering in PMLA is very wide. The immunity granted by the law for acts of omission by reporting entities can be overridden by investigating agencies. This indirectly controls the pace of adding new sections of reporting entities.
FATF is shortening its evaluation cycle for countries with an increased emphasis on areas of highest risks in terms of money laundering, terrorism and arms proliferation. India can tailor its policing apparatus to the specific risks it faces, but cannot be a laggard given the size of its economy and its rising stature in global capital flows. It pays to be technically compliant with international best practices ahead of emergent risks.